Elon, Thanks But No Thanks
The system is broken, but another billionaire party boss can't fix it.
Elon Musk just launched a new political party. The “America Party.”
Poll-tested. Algorithm-approved. He’s calling for disruption, competition, and an end to the “Uniparty”, and millions of his followers seem to agree.
So, I wanted to start by thanking you Elon.
Thank you for putting a spotlight on the deep rot of the two-party system. Thank you for calling out the corruption, the performative politics, and the duopoly that’s been running our democracy like it’s a dying brand.
But as an Independent Strategist, one who has been working on this solution for awhile now there are a few things I want to highlight in your strategy that you have right and wrong with your approach.
Because what you’re proposing? It’s not new. And it’s not it.
Let’s Start With The Problem
The problem isn’t simply that we have two major parties.
It’s how much power we have handed those two parties over every aspect of our democracy.
They control the rules of the game, and they play dirty.
From presidential debates to ballot access, from closed primaries to campaign finance laws, the Republican and Democratic parties have built a rigged infrastructure that keeps competitors out and loyalty in. If you don’t play by their rules, you don’t get to play at all.
And that’s not because good people are not trying to enter public service. They are. But once they get in, they face a system where the incentives are completely backward. Progress and innovation get punished. Toe the party line, and you get committee seats and reelection support. Step out of line, and you’re sidelined or primaried.
It’s not a meritocracy, it’s a machine.
And that machine only works for those willing to grease its gears.
Meanwhile, if you try to run outside that machine, you’re on your own.
No voter files. No donor lists. No consultants. No media coverage. No legal team to navigate endless ballot access challenges. You’re left floating in the wind without a sail while the parties cruise on government-subsidized yachts.
The real problem isn’t a lack of choice. It’s a lack of access.
And the two parties will do whatever it takes to keep it that way, even if it means sacrificing American prosperity to preserve their own political positions.
That’s why new parties, no matter how well-intentioned or well-funded, keep hitting the same wall.
Just ask the Forward Party.
They had name recognition. They had money. They had a handful of former Democrats and Republicans trying to bridge the divide. But what they didn’t have and what no new party has was access to the levers of power. No infrastructure. No ballot access in most states. No local ground game. No path to real influence in a winner-take-all system.
They weren’t building a movement. They were trying to out-party the parties. And that’s why they stalled.
Voters Do Not Want A New Box
The growing number of independent are not asking for a new label.
They’re not waiting around for a shinier “Party C” to save them from Parties A and B.
Voters, especially younger generations, are walking away from the entire framework. They see a system that no longer reflects who they are, what they value, or how they live. A system built for Cold War binaries, not a 21st-century society full of nuance, complexity, and common ground.
They don’t want to check a different box.
They want to break the box.
This isn’t about being moderate, centrist, or some compromise between red and blue. It’s about rejecting the idea that identity and ideology should be locked into tribal, zero-sum political machines. Americans want to vote for people, not parties. For ideas, not ideologies. For solutions, not slogans.
They want independence, not another party boss.
And that’s a reality no billionaire, branding expert, or algorithm can repackage.
But Here’s Where Elon Has It Right
For all the branding bluster and tech-bro theatrics, Elon did land one thing exactly right:
The way to change Washington isn’t by winning it—it’s by balancing it.
Musk’s plan to target a handful of Senate and House races in swing districts—enough to deny either party a majority—isn’t a new idea. But it’s a smart one. It’s called the Fulcrum Caucus, and it just might be the most powerful tool we have to restore accountability in Congress.
Here’s how it works:
Instead of trying to replace the two parties or win dozens of elections overnight, the Fulcrum Strategy focuses on electing just a few truly independent candidates in the races that have no real competition—races where a few thousand votes can flip a seat. Once elected, those independents become the balance of power, or fulcrum, in closely divided legislatures.
They don’t need to win a majority.
They just need to deny the majority—and then negotiate on behalf of the American people.
This changes everything.
It forces both parties to come to the table. It gives independent voices leverage. It creates a new lane for policy built on consensus instead of conflict. And it reintroduces something our democracy hasn’t seen in decades: shared responsibility.
So Elon, if you're serious about that part—about flipping just enough seats to break the two-party monopoly on power—then yes. That’s where we must start.
But we don’t need a new party to do it.
We need a new kind of candidate. A new kind of coalition. A new kind of courage.
And that’s what the Fulcrum Strategy is all about.
Written by,
Austen Campbell
Founder | Independent National Coalition